Legislature(2001 - 2002)
04/24/2001 02:24 PM House FIN
Audio | Topic |
---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL NO. 179 An Act relating to underage drinking and drug offenses; and providing for an effective date. REPRESENTATIVE NORMAN ROKEBERG discussed that in 1994, the Legislature enacted the "Use It, Lose It" law (AS 28.15.183) for minors who are caught possessing or using alcohol. If a minor were caught using alcohol, their driver's license would be administratively revoked for a period of time. In December, in a case State versus Niedermeyer, the Alaska Supreme Court found that taking away a minor's driver's license for possession or consumption of alcohol or a controlled substance, without giving them a trial, was in violation of a minor's constitutional right to due process. Representative Rokeberg commented that if a minor is caught using alcohol or drugs, they are sent a letter from the Division of Motor Vehicles (DMV) stating that the DMV will not revoke their license until there has been a court conviction for the offense. At present, the district attorney's office is not prosecuting minors caught for consumption of alcohol, because the court system is not prepared to handle jury trials for this type of case. The effect of the Niedermeyer decision is that minors now go virtually unpunished for possessing or consuming alcohol. The maximum penalty that may currently be enforced on minors who are caught consuming or possessing alcohol is a $100 fine. Representative Rokeberg advised that the law would impose appropriate punishments on minors who use alcohol, and will be a deterrent to minors when they consider drinking. Statistics show that the earlier a person begins drinking, the more likely they are to have problems with alcohol later in life. By sending a message early to minors that their actions will not go unpunished, we hope to deter alcohol problems in the future. Representative Rokeberg continued that the bill would establish a graduated system of punishment for minors who are caught consuming, possessing or controlling alcohol. On a minor's first offense, he/she would be subject to a fine of between $200-600, would have to attend alcohol information school, and would be placed on probation. For a minor's second offense, the minor would be guilty of repeat minor consuming and would be subject to a fine of $1000, at least 48 hours of community work service, a three-month license revocation, and probation. A minor's third offense would cause them to be guilty of habitual minor consuming, which would be a Class B misdemeanor, resulting in up to a $1000 fine and 90 days in jail. In addition, the minor would lose his/her license for a period of six months, would be required to complete at least 96 hours of community work service, and be placed on probation. Vice-Chair Bunde questioned the "three time" aspect of the legislation and suggested that a second offense should merit serious consequences. Representative Rokeberg explained that the second offense does demand the option for a jury trial and mandates a three-month revocation of the driver's license. He noted that the testimony before the House Judiciary Committee pointed out that under the current use it or loose it statute, there were juveniles in the State that had up to seven offenses, thus, creating a problem with revocation of licenses. He thought that statute was a failure. Vice-Chair Bunde referenced the chart distributed and the second offense charges associated with the offense. [Copy on File]. Discussion followed between Vice-Chair Bunde and Representative Rokeberg regarding current law default. Representative Foster referenced the sponsor statement recommendation for an Alcohol Information School. He inquired how attendance would be mandated. Representative Rokeberg replied that would be mandatory if such a school was available in that area. Co-Chair Williams MOVED to ADOPT Amendment #1. [Copy on File]. Co-Chair Mulder OBJECTED for discussion. Representative Rokeberg explained that the amendment would delete all material on Page 2, Line 3, following the word "group", and replacing that language with: "Selected by the court to serve as a sentencing option for persons convicted of a violation under this section". He noted that the Courts had recommended the amendment for greater flexibility. Co-Chair Mulder WITHDREW his OBJECTION. There being NO further OBJECTION, Amendment #1 was adopted. Representative Davies MOVED to ADOPT Amendment #2. [Copy on File]. Co-Chair Williams OBJECTED for discussion. Representative Rokeberg stated that the amendment would delete all language on Page 6, Lines 5-6. CHUCK HOSACK, [TESTIFIED VIA TELECONFERNCE], DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES, ANCHORAGE, noted that the Division supported Amendment #2. TAPE HFC 01 - 94, Side A Co-Chair Williams WITHDREW his OBJECTION. Representative Hudson MOVED to ADOPT Amendment #3. [Copy on File]. Co-Chair Williams OBJECTED for discussion. Representative Hudson asked to amend Amendment #3 by adding "Juneau" to the definition of pilot juvenile alcohol safety action programs. He added that following "Kotzebue", adding the language "for treatment only". He asked if the Alcohol Safety Action Programs (ASAP) had been included in the bill. Representative Rokeberg replied they were. He added that the amendment would limit the treatment elements. He suggested that the amendment could reduce the cost of the fiscal notes while continuing the concept. Representative Davies agreed with the intent of the amendment, however, noted that the way in which the amendment had been written would cause problems. He suggested deleting the amendment from the Page 12, Lines 13- 14. He believed that could remove all ASAP's from the bill. ELMER LINDSTROM, SPECIAL ASSISTANT TO COMMISSIONER PERDUE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES, stated that the intent of the legislation was to allow for the juvenile alcohol safety action program to continue as originally envisioned and limit obligations for the additional treatment dollars. Mr. Lindstrom claimed that it would be a mistake to delete that language. He commented that the cleanest way would be through intent language which would allow the additional treatment resources in those locations and would allow the fiscal notes to conform to that. Representative Davies advised that there were additional portions of the amendment that do not work together. Representative Rokeberg voiced concern with switching from unqualified law to a letter of intent for the program. He voiced concern with the cost containment unless there was a strict review by the HESS budget subcommittee about how that program would be expanded. He reiterated that the letter of intent would not be enough. Co-Chair Williams agreed. Representative Davies suggested modifying the amendment, on Page 12, omitting that section and inserting a new bill Section #18. Co-Chair Williams asked that Representative J. Davies and Representative Rokeberg work together to come up with appropriate language. At-Ease: 4:45 P.M. Reconvene: 4:50 P.M. Representative Hudson WITHDREW the amendment to the amendment. Representative Hudson WITHDREW Amendment #3. There being NO OBJECTION, it was withdrawn. Representative Davies MOVED to ADOPT a new Amendment #3. He referenced the old Amendment #3 and stated that the new #3 would retain the changes recommended to Page 3, Line 5 and Page 9, Line 29. On Page 12, the delete portion would be struck and then retaining the inserted language. Page 12, Lines 13-4 would read, "Insert a new bill section". The new section would read: "Alcohol Treatment Program". He added that after "Fairbanks", "Juneau" should be inserted with "for treatment only". All the language on Page 12, Line 15 would be eliminated. Co-Chair Mulder clarified the amendment would decrease the fiscal note to $800 thousand dollars. Mr. Lindstrom spoke to the three fiscal notes from Department of Health & Social Services. He noted that the amendment would reduce note #1 to $400 thousand dollars and that note #2 and #3 would remain the same. There being NO OBJECTION, the new Amendment #3 was adopted. Representative Hudson MOVED to report CS HB 179 (FIN) out of Committee with individual recommendations and with the accompanying fiscal notes with the indicated changes. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered. CS HB 179 (FIN) was reported out of Committee with a "do pass" recommendation and with fiscal notes by #2 Department of Corrections, #5 Department of Health & Social Services, #6 Department of Health & Social Services, and new fiscal notes by the Department of Law, the Alaska Court System, Department of Health & Social Services, and Department of Administration.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|